In May of 2006, British mountaineer David Sharp died while climbing alone on Mt. Everest. He was approximately 450 meters below the summit and the exact details of what went wrong are unknown to this day.
But what is known is that while he lay there in the snow, just off the main path on Everest’s North Side, roughly 40 climbers passed him on their way to the top. No one stopped to render aid or tried to conduct a rescue, and the 34-year old perished while others went up to celebrate their successful summits.
The incident resulted in quite a backlash within the mountaineering community which still resonates to this day. Some were critical of the fact that no team even attempted to bring Sharp, who was suffering from exposure and altitude sickness, down the mountain, and a number of high profile figures on Everest were lambasted for leaving David to die. Those involved more directly in the controversy claim that there was confusion over the Sharp’s health and status, and communications over what to do for him were unclear as well.
It didn’t help that much of the media at the time portrayed the climbers as being very callous, not carrying what happened to another human being, while remaining singularly focused on getting to the top of Everest. Few understood the logistics of pulling off a high altitude rescue, but the fact that no one even tried has been at the center of this story since it first broke.
One of the climbers who was there that day, and walked past Sharp on his way to the summit, was New Zealander Mark Inglis, a double-amputee who made history by becoming the first man to climb the world’s tallest mountain without either of his legs. Inglis went on to write a book about that experience and included his recollection of what happened regarding Sharp.
Inglis maintains that he and his teammates thought that David was already dead, so they continued on their way, but not before checking in with team leader Russell Brice back in Base Camp, who allegedly told the team to forget about Sharp and keep moving. Brice for his part says that he didn’t speak with Inglis about the matter, which has led to even more confusion over the whole situation.
This has all been brought to the forefront once again thanks to an interview that Inglis conducted with the BBC. In that interview, the Kiwi climber says that he regrets not going back when his team came across Sharp on the mountain, but he continues to say that a rescue wasn’t possible, particularly in the extreme cold and altitude on Everest. Unfortunately, the BBC won’t let me embed the video here, but you can watch a segment of it by clicking here.
The David Sharp controversy has been an on going one over the past few years, and considering some teams have since successfully conducted high altitude rescues on Everest and other mountains, it isn’t likely to go away anytime soon. While it is a sad story to say the least, I do think it has had a positive impact on the mountaineering community, who seem less likely to simply give up on a fellow climber in the wake of the events that went down on Everest back in 2006.
Thanks to Adventure Journal for sharing the link to the video.
- Gear Review: The Xero Scrambler Mid is an Ultralight Hiking Shoe for Spring - March 1, 2023
- Gear Review: Yeti Roadie 48 Wheeled Cooler - August 18, 2022
- Kristin Harila Continues Pursuit of 8000-Meter Speed Record - August 16, 2022
Very good article, you had information I didn't know about before. The whole thing was a sad event. May he rest in peace.
Rachel
This article is actually incorrect as you neglect to mention that some climbers did try to assist him on the descent but he was beyond saving. David Sharp could not walk and was already very frost bitten so rescue was impossible. If you read the book Dark Summit and other accounts various Sherpas and climbers did talk to him, leave him oxygen and try and move him but he was unable to get down. There have been very few successful rescues at this height with someone in such a bad state and David had chosen to ascend alone and without much support. I think most of the commentary on the matter comes from people who do not understand the reality of the situation.
There has been much written about David Sharps death; documentaries made, Time Mag had constructed a detailed presumed timeline. I understand the points made in this article. It is obvious that David Sharps death and the circumstances surrounding it has caused the Mountaineering community pause for reflection. Reading so much about what happened in terms of climbers: who stopped to render assistance, who didn't, who noticed him, who didn't, most didn't know him, one or two did. Personally, what I've taken from everything I've read is that I would never attempt this climb without being a member of an expedition team. There is a roster of climbers, and some accountability to team members on and off the Mountain. I am not saying he couldn't or could be saved, my point is solo climbing presents confusion and danger to every climber on the Mountain. It puts others in a position of responsibility that many are not equipped to handle for any number of reasons including inexperience, or illness themselves. Within a team, I think regardless of the outcome, David Sharps peril would have been reported much earlier on by a team member and a sequence of events would be decided upon and properly planned and executed in an attempt to remedy if possible. I feel bad for David and everyone who struggled with this. I don't think solo climbs should be allowed for everyone's benefit. I am not advocating nobody inquiring on a climber that appears distressed, especially if that climber is up to it, I am saying so many are not and they should have some assurance that the climber is with a team. Also I think climbers should have their team clearly displayed on their down suits.